Wednesday 26 September 2012


I guess this blog is the only reason many of us know how corrupt the NIPER's system is. This blog is not different from Anna Hazare's campaign against corruption. His campaign is not defaming India and similarly this blog not defaming NIPER. It is against the corrupt administrators of NIPER.

The reputation of NIPER is due to the impression we (alumni) make on our future employers. If NIPER continues to run like the way it had been run in last decade, I won't be surprised if all of the experienced professors leave it one day. 

To name a few, just think how different Dept of Pharmaceutics would have been had Dr Ramesh Panchagnula stayed in NIPER till now. After he left the national bioavailability center hasn't been used even once. 

Same is the case with Dr Ravi Kumar, but lets not go in all those details. The point is, somehow those who think independently and are ambitious are suppressed in NIPER. This has to change someday, and I think this blog is a good beginning in that direction.

The fear of new faculty not joining NIPER is true, but it is better for those good souls not to join NIPER rather than leaving it mid-way through their carriers. 

I hope you know why Dr Sakhlani left NIPER. He was in Natural products dept and Dr Bhutani was the HOD, join the dots..

If any of the accusations made by Dr Nilanjan Roy were not true, I don't think this blog would have survived so long. NIPER would have taken some disciplinary action including court order to stop him from posting or atleast a defamation case by NIPER, what we see instead is routine visits of NIPER by CBI..

Lets hope this is just a small turbulence in NIPER's history, but eventually leads to a strong dedicated NIPER administration which can bring back its glory..


1 comment:

  1. The leader and the administrator should trust their fellow colleagues in their profession. They should be much inclined towards friendly environment. They should be given warning and memos (official procedures) if they have done any flawful procedures. This is not the era to boycott any official rules.Instead of applying RTI they should directly talk to their higher official by face to face discussion.This will bring their mind to apologize each other for their mistakes. I Hope the above stated relationship will bring the glory and success to their organization. Let the highest leader and petitionar should make compromise deal and cases should be withdrawn in both the cases against the Institute as well as peitionar

    Then only the venomous fight between both the group will be neutralized without going to judiciary, CBI, and CVC. Just its my suggestion what ever is happened is happened. We have to work hard to bring the reputation of NIPER which is having International name in the field of pharmaceutics.

    by - Voice of India for the betterment of organization as well as Peititionar.